- Infos im HLRS Wiki sind nicht rechtsverbindlich und ohne Gewähr -
- Information contained in the HLRS Wiki is not legally binding and HLRS is not responsible for any damages that might result from its use -

Compiler(Hawk): Difference between revisions

From HLRS Platforms
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
<br>
<br>


We '''highly''' recommend to try as much of them as possible and compare the performance of the generated code! If you code according to language standards, this is almost for free but can give you a significant speedup! There is no such thing as an "ideal" compiler! One suites better to application A, one suites better to application B (cf. [http://www.prace-ri.eu/IMG/pdf/Best-Practice-Guide-AMD.pdf Best Practice Guide AMD Naples]).
We '''highly''' recommend to try as much of them as possible and compare the performance of the generated code! If you code according to language standards, this is almost for free but can give you a significant speedup! There is no such thing as an "ideal" compiler! One suites better to application A, one suites better to application B (cf. [http://www.prace-ri.eu/IMG/pdf/Best-Practice-Guide-AMD.pdf Best Practice Guide AMD EPYC (Naples)]).

Revision as of 15:32, 11 October 2019

The following compilers are available at Hawk:

  • GNU
  • AMD
  • PGI
  • Intel


We highly recommend to try as much of them as possible and compare the performance of the generated code! If you code according to language standards, this is almost for free but can give you a significant speedup! There is no such thing as an "ideal" compiler! One suites better to application A, one suites better to application B (cf. Best Practice Guide AMD EPYC (Naples)).