- Infos im HLRS Wiki sind nicht rechtsverbindlich und ohne Gewähr -
- Information contained in the HLRS Wiki is not legally binding and HLRS is not responsible for any damages that might result from its use -
NEC Aurora difference: Difference between revisions
From HLRS Platforms
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "'''How does it differ from SX-ACE and previous SX models?''' in many ways. * it is affordable and low power (VE card is below 300W and competitive to GPU pricing, it is affo...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''This documentation is deprecated as of 2025-01-02.''' | |||
'''How does it differ from SX-ACE and previous SX models?''' | '''How does it differ from SX-ACE and previous SX models?''' | ||
Latest revision as of 09:50, 2 January 2025
This documentation is deprecated as of 2025-01-02.
How does it differ from SX-ACE and previous SX models?
in many ways.
- it is affordable and low power (VE card is below 300W and competitive to GPU pricing, it is affordable for workstations)
- it tries to follow standards and de-facto industry standards, it tries to blend in, by being little endian, by using glibc and linux where possible
- as easy to program as previous machines, but also usable as accelerator
- much more open, ISA documentation is public, VEOS sourcecode is opensource, YOU can write your own compiler!
- targeting also ML and data analytics, with some unique software available
How does it differ from favorite x86-64?
- memory bandwidth, > 1TB/s in one card in <300W.
- less but strong cores, 192 FP operations per core per cycle (AMD Rome 16, intel cascade lake 32)
- less memory (48GB) but fast memory (HBM2)